Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Solaris vs Windows 2000

Re: Solaris vs Windows 2000

From: Steve Perry <sperry_at_sprynet.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 07:09:08 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.00502071.20021113070908@fatcity.com>


Jared,

Here's my recollection of a losing battle. I hope this helps.

I "used" to work on Unix (AIX and Solaris) and can only think about the good ol' days...
Now, I work on Comcrap Servers (i mean HP) running Microslop NT and 2000. We have tons of them :)
I asked my boss why they are using Windows instead of Unix. I gave him all the arguments about scalability, secure... and not having to do the weekly reboots and he listened patiently. He finally said "How much will a Sun server cost?". I said I'd have to check on it, but he said We are running a 500 gig SAP system on a $5K compaq with 6 other compaq app servers that cost less than that. He asked what the Unix would cost. I started to answer that the hardware isn't the only cost and we have an EMC disk array behind it, but he stopped me and said it doesn't matter. He walks into the CIO's office and asks for a $70K dollar Solaris box and he gets booted out of the office. He can nickle and dime him for $5K servers...
I pointed out that we had to spend a million dollars on a EMC Symmetrix with Clarion and he said "exactly". We spend the big money on the I/O subsystem for a bunch of servers and we can buy all the cheap up front hardware we want. Next, he pointed out that we'd have to hire a Unix admin and that would cost money. "Everybody knows how to administer Windows" he says. I said "pressing control-alt-del isn't administration". He also said that with EMC behind the scenes we don't have to worry about distributing the I/O. EMC will take care of it for us. I said that look at all the wasted time because we have to come in weekends (at least once a month) and install Win patches that take our systems down. "That doesn't cost us anything because you're not paid hourly and that only impacts a few people" my boss says. "What about all the time wasted finding tools/scripts so we can do the same type of monitoring/troubleshooting that you can on Unix", I ask. "You only need that once in a while and we can reboot the system if can't determine the problem" he laughs. His last argument was that all the developers want the MS platform so they can write VB and .NET apps. "MS works really well with other MS products than it does with other vendors", Nobody knows java. I said "90% of the developers are contractors, we can bring in that talent". His final answer was "That was inappropriate and people with those skills cost more". -- How can you argue with that mentality? He forgets that I have mentored or helped get a few developers up to speed on Oracle and now that they understand it more, they really appreciate it.

The Wintel platform for the most part has worked for us as long as you have a million dollar disk array behind it ;) Oracle's a little quirky on it - one time it won't shutdown and the next time the exact same situation it does... You're going to have a tough time arguing price unless you have all the numbers and you can hammer it home the first time - you only get one chance... Don't forget that your manager has to walk in to the office of the CIO or CFO and justify it to them.
My argument would be, if you have employees with unix skills keep the unix platform. Once you get MS inhouse, it's like a virus - you will have 1000 pet projects spread across the enterprise in developer's cubes and PCs with post-its that say "Don't Shutdown - Dept. XYZ Risk Mgt. System!!!". Don't forget my manager's comment that "Everybody can administer a Windows box." - Once it's in the doors, everybody will and there's no security... It reminds me of when i worked on the mainframe and we got our first Unix system in. The mainframers said we only need one mainframe to support the company and 10 unix servers. Now it's 10 unix servers and 1000 MS servers... look at all the support costs that go into supporting all that.

--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: Steve Perry
  INET: sperry_at_sprynet.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Wed Nov 13 2002 - 09:09:08 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US