RE: Solaris vs Windows 2000

I'm ready.

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:49 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

You're right .. but when will it become ready? MS always said their NT3.5 is enterprise eady, they said NT4.0 is enterprise ready, W2K is enterprise ready, .Net is enterprise ready. It's all in the marketing. If enough people like me say Linux is ready, then it becomes ready. Readiness is relative.

I'd say it's ready enough.

Maybe not SAP specifically.

But if you havn't heard, Oracle software runs on Linux fine with a lot of support available for it already today - Dell, RedHat, Oracle & IBM all support Linux.

--
Lyndon Tiu

On Wednesday 13 November 2002 05:39 am, Jared Still wrote:


> Lyndon,

>

> I like linux.  I've been using it for 10 years now.

>

> It still isn't ready to run my production SAP systems though.

>

> I don't mean that it's not capable of doing so, it's very capable.

>

> There is not the history of support and stability that is needed

> to trust my enterprise data to it.  My Oracle dev server?  No

> problem, I love it.

>

> Will I put my butt on the line for bleeding edge technology?

>

> No way.  SAP runs our business, pure and simple.  If it's down,

> we are not selling product, we are not producing product.

>

> I'm not ready to trust linux that far yet.

>

> Jared

>

> On Monday 11 November 2002 19:34, Lyndon Tiu wrote:

> > Seriously now.

> >

> > I know you are trying to evaluate Solaris and Windows, but ...

> >

> > Linux is the way to go. Sun's are expensive machines.

> >

> > NT/2K are cheap(er) but locks you into an expensive software upgrade

> > cycle.

> >

> > Linux costs very little and runs on cheap hardware.

> >

> > --

> > Lyndon Tiu

> >

> > On Monday 11 November 2002 06:58 pm, Stephen Lee wrote:

> > > -----Original Message-----

> > > Now that that's out of the way, what I am trying to do is find

> > > objective material comparing the use of MS Windows 2000

> > > Server on Intel HW to Solaris on Sun HW.

> > > ------------------------------------------------

> > >

> > > My personal bias against Windows is based mostly on three things.

> > >

> > > 1.  Incompatibility with everything else.  Microsoft makes its products

> > > as incompatible as it can get away with so that once you start going

> > > down the Microsoft path, you become more and more locked into that

> > > path.

> > >

> > > 2.  It is a single-user operating system.  Microsoft has done a pretty

> > > good job of making it look otherwise by tacking on some multi-user

> > > extensions; but it is, in fact, NOT a multi-user OS.  Just try creating

> > > a general user so that user can install, upgrade, and maintain their

> > > application without having administrator privilege.  It ain't gonna

> > > happen.  And that brings up the main problem with this arrangement:

> > > Every user that must support an application on the box must have

> > > administrator privilege.  This, of course, presents a completely

> > > insecure environment.

> > >

> > > 3.  In its "normal" form, there is an amazing lack of the kind of

> > > support and scripting utilities the are normal on Unix.  True, if one

> > > wants to spend the time, many of the utilities can be set up on NT; but

> > > that involves additional setup and maintenance time -- which your NT

> > > admins might not be inclined to do if the bureaucracy of your

> > > organization requires that they do it.  If your scripting abilities are

> > > substantial, then you, no doubt, automate many things with scripts.  If

> > > you have built these scripts with a non-standard environment, then you

> > > have built your house on shifting sand. (By the way, this is why I do

> > > not fully support Linux.)

> > >

> > > I must agree that I do like the Dell Poweredge stuff.  I was using it

> > > years ago, and the value is certainly compelling.  It's too bad that

> > > Sun did the same thing with Solaris on Intel that IBM did to OS/2 (got

> > > very stuck up about it and over-priced the crap out of everything until

> > > it was too late). But the Sun hardware (and IBM too) ain't all that

> > > shabby either.  And my past experience -- when I was a sys admin work

> > > -- with Sun customer support was very positive. IBM .... eh, so-so ...

> > > maybe.

> > >

> > > Perhaps another thing to consider: If you have ever tried to upgrade

> > > the OS on a NT box supporting third-party applications, I suspect you

> > > discovered that it can be an excrutiatingly painful experience ... If

> > > you even succeeded at all.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Lyndon Tiu
  INET: ltiu_at_alumni.sfu.ca

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Farnsworth, Dave
  INET: DFarnsworth_at_Ashleyfurniture.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).