Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: RE: Strangeness with PL/SQL and ProC

RE: RE: Strangeness with PL/SQL and ProC

From: Robertson Lee - lerobe <lerobe_at_acxiom.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 02:13:18 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.00424162.20020310021318@fatcity.com>


Thanks to all for the replys on this one.

It looks like we are going to get the chaps to seriously think about using PL/SQL for the future.

Regards

Lee

-----Original Message-----
Sent: 08 March 2002 16:38
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

Lee,

    Over the years I've developed a very strong appreciation for TCP/IP as a fast, error free communication protocol. At the same time I've also developer a
VERY strong appreciation for how slow SQL*Net is. Anything you can do to minimize that part of an application helps 10 fold.

    BTW, getting onto the object bandwagon a bit. I've developed, over the last
three years, a strong appreciation for doing a lot of database access stuff in
PL/SQL and hopefully JAVA in the future. Having a package with a defined interface to the external programs modularizes things so nicely it's breathtaking. I've now a wonderful relation ship with duhvelopers as we do that
interface definition. They go off and develop their front ends as they want knowing what the interface at the database looks like. I can then go off and
create a very nice, efficient, and normalized (with referential integrity) database and code the package body as needed, including modifications and bug
fixes without causing them a pile of grief. In the end we get the job done faster, neater, and with less hassle. Guess I'm going to have to start calling
them developers pretty soon. :-)

Dick Goulet

____________________Reply Separator____________________
Author: Robertson Lee - lerobe <lerobe_at_acxiom.co.uk>
Date:       3/8/02 3:23 PM

Thanks for that Dick, the communication issue was one we had considered, you are confirming this from what you say below. Thanks again for the response.

Lee

-----Original Message-----
Sent: 08 March 2002 13:53
To: Robertson Lee - lerobe; Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

Lee,

    Stop a minute and take a look at what your doing. I assume that when the
process was pure PRO*C there must have been a pile of communication between the
database and the program. This communication, even if done by IPC takes time.
Now when you re-code it in PL/SQL there is no reason for process to database communication, hence it takes less time. Allow me to provide an illustration:

    We had a OCI program that would load tester data from NT shares every morning into our Unix based database. Normally this process took around 8 to 10
hours to run. When MicroSoft OS/2 died several years ago yours truly ported the
program from OS/2 to NT in the process re-coding it in PRO*C. Now since paramaterization of SQL was not the original authors forte, the program started
running a little faster, but still 6 to 8 hours. Now comes Y2K, a new server &
database evrsion & some normalization takes place resulting in a new database
design. When I reviewed the program I note that there were a number of back and
forth communication requirements that were in the original. It took something
like 5 round trips to the database for queries to decide if we were going to insert a new record or update an existing one. Well, I took all of that code
out of PRO*C, re-coded it as a PL/SQL package and today that same program runs
in a little over 1 hour with one round trip from the client to the database.

Dick Goulet

____________________Reply Separator____________________
Author: Robertson Lee - lerobe <lerobe_at_acxiom.co.uk>
Date:       3/8/02 2:03 AM

> Oracle 8.0.5.0.0
> Tru64 4.0f
>
> We have a process running here and without going into the detail of it we
> have a Pro C program that is taking ages to run updates and selects (2
> hours to do 10000 records). The program was changed to PL/SQL and we
> suddenly were seeing 5 million records processed in 1 hour.
>
> Is PL/SQL that much faster than Pro C. Can somone more in the know give
> me some hints ??
>
> TIA
>
> Lee
>
>

The information contained in this communication is confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to the sender and delete the original message or any copy of it from your computer system.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Robertson Lee - lerobe
  INET: lerobe_at_acxiom.co.uk

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: dgoulet_at_vicr.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Robertson Lee - lerobe
  INET: lerobe_at_acxiom.co.uk

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Sun Mar 10 2002 - 04:13:18 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US