Re: Does the phrase " Russell's paradox " should be replaced with another phrase?
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 17:41:50 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <a597d6da-889d-4a2c-be36-ba6f39377f6e_at_googlegroups.com>
Dana srijeda, 25. veljače 2015. u 17:57:40 UTC+1, korisnik vldm10 napisao je:
> In my data model I use Leibniz's Law and my generalization of Leibniz's Law
> (In my paper I named it - the General Law).
I think I need further clarification in relation to this above text: I introduced the following theories:
1.
In my data model, the entity is determined, by using above-mentioned laws.
So, in my data model, entities are constructed of attributes (intrinsic and
extrinsic).
2.
However I also construct states of entities. In my data model, states of an entity
are determined with the general knowledge of one or more subjects about the entity.
An entity is the best determined by its states. So, when we use the states of an
entity, then we have the best identification of the entity.
Thus, states are not determined by using Leibniz's Law or by using General Law.
I have introduced two kinds of history of events. (i) The history of events from the past. (ii) The history of events from the future.
Vladimir Odrljin Received on Fri Mar 06 2015 - 02:41:50 CET