Re: On Normalisation & the State of Normalisation

From: <compdb_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:01:09 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <c04d086f-9fba-4492-9011-e34cc160d750_at_googlegroups.com>

On Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 1:58:13 PM UTC-8, com..._at_hotmail.com wrote:

> To show that an alleged process is adequate one need only give it and either a counterexample or sound justification.

Typo. Inadequate.

philip Received on Thu Feb 05 2015 - 23:01:09 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Derek Asirvadem: "Re: References & Restatement"
In reply to compdb_at_hotmail.com: "Re: On Normalisation & the State of Normalisation"
Next in thread: Derek Asirvadem: "Re: On Normalisation & the State of Normalisation"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message