Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one?
From: lawpoop <lawpoop_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:46:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <0ef36169-a2c9-4789-952b-c31283a1ca9b_at_t2g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:46:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <0ef36169-a2c9-4789-952b-c31283a1ca9b_at_t2g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
On Oct 14, 4:44 pm, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
> I don't see any particularly compelling reason for donors and donations
> relations based on the meager information available from your post.
> However, I suspect a compelling argument can be made for the necessity
> of donations and replies relations.
Care to expound? :) Received on Wed Oct 14 2009 - 22:46:31 CEST