Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys

From: Philipp Post <post.philipp_at_googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <f89a8dbe-d007-4e5e-8a3a-32fe669590f3_at_d21g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>

Bob,

> To whom did you reply? Please do not remove the attributions. <

I replied to Sampo's last message.

brgds

Philipp Post Received on Wed Sep 23 2009 - 16:01:56 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: kschendel: "Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys"
Maybe in reply to: Sampo Syreeni: "two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys"
In reply to Bob Badour: "Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys"
Next in thread: kschendel: "Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message