comp.databases.theory: by author

-CELKO-
- Re: How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 16:21:22 CET)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? (Sat Jan 24 2009 - 17:26:56 CET)
- Re: how to design database for binary tree (Wed Jan 21 2009 - 15:05:57 CET)
A. M. G. Solo
- Call for Papers: Computer Science, Computer Engineering, and Applied Computing Conferences, July 13-16, 2009, USA, WORLDCOMP'09 (Thu Jan 22 2009 - 15:18:03 CET)
- CFP: The 2009 International Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practice (SERP'09), USA, July 13-16, 2009 (Thu Jan 15 2009 - 11:41:21 CET)
- CFP: The 2009 International Conference on Information and Knowledge Engineering (IKE'09), USA, July 13-16, 2009 (Fri Jan 09 2009 - 12:12:33 CET)
Aaron Adams
- ***2009 Salford Data Mining Conference - San Diego, CA*** (Mon Jan 26 2009 - 20:20:34 CET)
Auno Saari
- Re: Ankeriaspornoa (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 10:10:21 CET)
Bob Badour
- Re: How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 15:29:55 CET)
- Re: How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? (Wed Jan 28 2009 - 23:11:01 CET)
- Re: Design question (Sat Jan 24 2009 - 20:55:55 CET)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? (Sat Jan 24 2009 - 19:57:09 CET)
- Re: Design question (Sat Jan 24 2009 - 19:17:59 CET)
- Re: Design question (Sat Jan 24 2009 - 19:14:38 CET)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? (Thu Jan 22 2009 - 21:53:31 CET)
- Re: How would I do this sub-select? (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 19:26:24 CET)
- Re: How would I do this sub-select? (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 18:56:17 CET)
- Re: How would I do this sub-select? (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 17:08:51 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Sat Jan 10 2009 - 04:20:41 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Fri Jan 09 2009 - 23:14:57 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Fri Jan 09 2009 - 19:59:00 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Fri Jan 09 2009 - 02:30:56 CET)
- Re: DBMS recommendation? (Mon Jan 05 2009 - 14:53:37 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Sun Jan 04 2009 - 06:25:41 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Thu Jan 01 2009 - 02:46:05 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Thu Jan 01 2009 - 02:39:54 CET)
Brian Selzer
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? (Fri Jan 23 2009 - 01:58:26 CET)
- Re: a union is always a join! (Thu Jan 08 2009 - 04:35:12 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints (Tue Jan 06 2009 - 13:31:14 CET)
- Re: a union is always a join! (Tue Jan 06 2009 - 06:14:17 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints (Tue Jan 06 2009 - 05:43:19 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints (Mon Jan 05 2009 - 16:19:35 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints (Thu Jan 01 2009 - 08:05:43 CET)
carl.henthorn_at_gmail.com
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? (Fri Jan 23 2009 - 01:18:13 CET)
- Best way to design table to store attributes? (Thu Jan 22 2009 - 21:35:07 CET)
Cimode
- Re: Search efficiency - RDMS search versus free text search (Tue Jan 13 2009 - 12:34:34 CET)
compdb_at_hotmail.com
- Re: a union is always a join! (Fri Jan 30 2009 - 06:05:18 CET)
- Re: a union is always a join! (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 23:05:55 CET)
dan_at_nospam.com
- Re: How would I do this sub-select? (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 20:00:57 CET)
- Re: How would I do this sub-select? (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 19:11:34 CET)
- Re: How would I do this sub-select? (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 18:05:38 CET)
- How would I do this sub-select? (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 16:49:32 CET)
David BL
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? (Mon Jan 26 2009 - 02:22:34 CET)
DBMS_Plumber
- Re: how to design database for binary tree (Wed Jan 28 2009 - 05:50:22 CET)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? (Wed Jan 28 2009 - 05:48:28 CET)
Ed Prochak
- Re: how to design database for binary tree (Tue Jan 20 2009 - 22:15:21 CET)
Gene Wirchenko
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Sun Jan 04 2009 - 07:49:07 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints (Thu Jan 01 2009 - 08:33:00 CET)
Hugo Kornelis
- Re: How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? (Wed Jan 28 2009 - 22:53:13 CET)
imbiz40_at_gmail.com
- Earn Online, Want to know how? (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 13:47:31 CET)
JOG
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Sun Jan 04 2009 - 04:27:20 CET)
john
- EISWT-09 call for papers (Fri Jan 02 2009 - 19:00:32 CET)
JuergenRiemer
- Re: DBMS recommendation? (Mon Jan 05 2009 - 15:41:06 CET)
- DBMS recommendation? (Mon Jan 05 2009 - 11:10:13 CET)
kashi
- Re: how to design database for binary tree (Tue Jan 27 2009 - 12:17:23 CET)
- how to design database for binary tree (Tue Jan 20 2009 - 11:26:12 CET)
- How to save in database binary tree values (Tue Jan 20 2009 - 11:19:46 CET)
Keith H Duggar
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Tue Jan 06 2009 - 04:54:30 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Sun Jan 04 2009 - 00:02:07 CET)
Mark S. (UK)
- Re: Design question (Sat Jan 24 2009 - 20:01:20 CET)
- Re: Design question (Sat Jan 24 2009 - 18:03:52 CET)
- Design question (Sat Jan 24 2009 - 17:23:26 CET)
patrick61z_at_yahoo.com
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? (Sat Jan 24 2009 - 22:44:16 CET)
- Re: Search efficiency - RDMS search versus free text search (Fri Jan 23 2009 - 22:06:15 CET)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? (Fri Jan 23 2009 - 21:39:41 CET)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? (Fri Jan 23 2009 - 21:27:59 CET)
paul c
- Re: a union is always a join! (Fri Jan 30 2009 - 21:18:04 CET)
- Re: Best way to design table to store attributes? (Sat Jan 24 2009 - 05:26:10 CET)
- Re: Search efficiency - RDMS search versus free text search (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 15:56:26 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Sat Jan 10 2009 - 02:34:56 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Fri Jan 09 2009 - 22:42:03 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Fri Jan 09 2009 - 16:02:14 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Fri Jan 09 2009 - 01:14:00 CET)
- Re: a union is always a join! (Wed Jan 07 2009 - 23:45:26 CET)
- a union is always a join! (Mon Jan 05 2009 - 22:56:27 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints (Mon Jan 05 2009 - 17:12:03 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Thu Jan 01 2009 - 03:25:26 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Fri Jan 02 2009 - 01:18:21 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 (Fri Jan 02 2009 - 01:13:09 CET)
Philipp Post
- Re: How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 12:10:21 CET)
Rb
- Biology Informatics Databases Search Engine VADLO.com (Sun Jan 11 2009 - 07:03:05 CET)
rpost
- Re: a union is always a join! (Thu Jan 08 2009 - 20:21:59 CET)
- Re: a union is always a join! (Wed Jan 07 2009 - 20:40:33 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Wed Jan 07 2009 - 19:40:41 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Wed Jan 07 2009 - 18:03:22 CET)
salmobytes
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer (Thu Jan 01 2009 - 01:47:51 CET)
Taras_96
- Re: Search efficiency - RDMS search versus free text search (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 12:46:08 CET)
- Search efficiency - RDMS search versus free text search (Tue Jan 13 2009 - 12:10:28 CET)
Ted Byers
- Re: How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 18:00:42 CET)
- How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? (Wed Jan 28 2009 - 21:10:34 CET)
toby
- Re: How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? (Wed Jan 28 2009 - 22:58:27 CET)
- Re: How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? (Wed Jan 28 2009 - 22:57:46 CET)
vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: Search efficiency - RDMS search versus free text search (Tue Jan 13 2009 - 19:49:05 CET)
Walter Mitty
- Re: How can a group by clause be modified so the end weeks of the year won't be split? (Thu Jan 29 2009 - 14:39:15 CET)
- Re: Search efficiency - RDMS search versus free text search (Wed Jan 14 2009 - 16:34:33 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints (Thu Jan 08 2009 - 14:14:46 CET)
webmaster_at_spatial-hydro.com
- For All your FREE GIS Data needs... (Sun Jan 25 2009 - 08:17:25 CET)

Last message date: Fri Jan 30 2009 - 21:18:04 CET
Archived on: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 23:55:17 CEST

97 messages sort by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ]
Nearby: [ About this archive ] [ Other mail archives ]