- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer paul c (Mon Dec 01 2008 - 15:19:17 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer paul c (Mon Dec 01 2008 - 15:22:03 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer paul c (Mon Dec 01 2008 - 15:43:29 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Walter Mitty (Mon Dec 01 2008 - 16:30:59 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Brian Selzer (Mon Dec 01 2008 - 23:09:38 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Brian Selzer (Mon Dec 01 2008 - 23:31:17 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Walter Mitty (Tue Dec 02 2008 - 17:28:51 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Brian Selzer (Wed Dec 03 2008 - 13:58:11 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Brian Selzer (Thu Dec 04 2008 - 04:02:54 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Brian Selzer (Sat Dec 06 2008 - 05:41:03 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer Brian Selzer (Sat Dec 06 2008 - 05:49:10 CET)
- Re: Long column names...Performance issues? Roy Hann (Sat Dec 06 2008 - 09:25:00 CET)
- Re: Long column names...Performance issues? Gints Plivna (Sat Dec 06 2008 - 18:41:28 CET)
- Re: Long column names...Performance issues? Ed Prochak (Mon Dec 08 2008 - 16:15:48 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' paul c (Tue Dec 09 2008 - 00:16:23 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Tue Dec 09 2008 - 01:13:42 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Tue Dec 09 2008 - 01:36:15 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer rpost (Tue Dec 09 2008 - 13:45:47 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer rpost (Tue Dec 09 2008 - 13:58:40 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer rpost (Tue Dec 09 2008 - 14:53:05 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language paul c (Wed Dec 10 2008 - 00:14:02 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language Cimode (Wed Dec 10 2008 - 01:42:44 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language Cimode (Wed Dec 10 2008 - 01:44:49 CET)
- Re: how to design db ilochab (Wed Dec 10 2008 - 16:09:16 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' JOG (Thu Dec 11 2008 - 02:25:52 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Thu Dec 11 2008 - 19:51:54 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Thu Dec 11 2008 - 20:11:47 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Thu Dec 11 2008 - 20:31:52 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Thu Dec 11 2008 - 22:28:55 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Thu Dec 11 2008 - 22:48:37 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Thu Dec 11 2008 - 23:24:48 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Thu Dec 11 2008 - 23:36:01 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 00:22:56 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' JOG (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 02:20:14 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 02:49:14 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 04:11:02 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language Cimode (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 11:16:35 CET)
- Re: native xml processing vs what Postgres and Oracle offer rpost (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 12:25:37 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' JOG (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 12:34:25 CET)
- Re: how to design db rpost (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 13:04:14 CET)
- Re: how to design db rpost (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 13:07:03 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language Cimode (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 13:48:18 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 18:55:11 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 19:31:09 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 21:49:18 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 22:29:06 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Fri Dec 12 2008 - 22:37:17 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language Cimode (Sat Dec 13 2008 - 10:17:34 CET)
- Re: Onto a potential relational manipulation language Cimode (Sat Dec 13 2008 - 13:29:44 CET)
- Call for Papers: The 2009 International Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practice (SERP'09), USA, July 13-16, 2009 A. M. G. Solo (Sun Dec 14 2008 - 05:10:23 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' Brian Selzer (Mon Dec 15 2008 - 04:29:50 CET)
- Re: Date and McGoveran comments on view updating 'problem' Brian Selzer (Mon Dec 15 2008 - 23:13:12 CET)
- Re: simple db - how am I doing so far? Ed Prochak (Tue Dec 16 2008 - 14:50:10 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 1 Brian Selzer (Wed Dec 17 2008 - 11:16:16 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Brian Selzer (Thu Dec 18 2008 - 05:12:43 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Cimode (Thu Dec 18 2008 - 21:31:32 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Cimode (Thu Dec 18 2008 - 21:36:38 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Thu Dec 18 2008 - 22:17:30 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Fri Dec 19 2008 - 19:29:57 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Cimode (Fri Dec 19 2008 - 20:25:06 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Cimode (Fri Dec 19 2008 - 20:26:15 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Cimode (Fri Dec 19 2008 - 20:48:49 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Fri Dec 19 2008 - 20:56:49 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Cimode (Sat Dec 20 2008 - 11:52:25 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Brian Selzer (Sat Dec 20 2008 - 12:09:23 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Cimode (Sat Dec 20 2008 - 13:26:47 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Sat Dec 20 2008 - 20:30:16 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Cimode (Sat Dec 20 2008 - 21:22:02 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Cimode (Sun Dec 21 2008 - 10:50:46 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Cimode (Sun Dec 21 2008 - 12:53:20 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Walter Mitty (Sun Dec 21 2008 - 15:25:11 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Sun Dec 21 2008 - 20:36:54 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Sun Dec 21 2008 - 20:49:56 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Sun Dec 21 2008 - 21:40:12 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Mon Dec 22 2008 - 03:04:37 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Mon Dec 22 2008 - 07:22:42 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Mon Dec 22 2008 - 07:32:52 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Mon Dec 22 2008 - 07:34:10 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 vadimtro_at_gmail.com (Mon Dec 22 2008 - 18:23:14 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Brian Selzer (Tue Dec 23 2008 - 06:50:15 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, Part 3 Walter Mitty (Tue Dec 23 2008 - 15:21:49 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 Brian Selzer (Sun Dec 28 2008 - 06:09:20 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints Brian Selzer (Sun Dec 28 2008 - 08:03:17 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 Cimode (Sun Dec 28 2008 - 15:10:08 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 Cimode (Sun Dec 28 2008 - 23:49:54 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints Brian Selzer (Mon Dec 29 2008 - 14:41:36 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints Walter Mitty (Tue Dec 30 2008 - 08:08:04 CET)
- Re: A different definition of MINUS, part 4 Cimode (Wed Dec 31 2008 - 10:13:43 CET)
- Re: algebra equations for Reference and FD constraints Brian Selzer (Wed Dec 31 2008 - 11:15:00 CET)
- Last message date: Mon Dec 01 2008 - 23:50:18 CET
- Archived on: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 23:55:14 CEST
|
