Re: Object-relational impedence
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:07:23 -0300
Message-ID: <47d7e39f$0$4077$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>>On 2008-03-10 23:28:40 -0500, Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com> said:
>>
>>
>>>Clearly comp.object and comp.databases.theory form just
>>>such a dyad, with data-centered vs. code-centered thinking
>>>the unresolvable heart of the conflict.
>>
>>So, in this entire discussion, have you seen me attack database theory
>>even once?
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:07:23 -0300
Message-ID: <47d7e39f$0$4077$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
David Cressey wrote:
> "Robert Martin" <unclebob_at_objectmentor.com> wrote in message > news:200803112125087826-unclebob_at_objectmentorcom... >
>>On 2008-03-10 23:28:40 -0500, Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com> said:
>>
>>
>>>Clearly comp.object and comp.databases.theory form just
>>>such a dyad, with data-centered vs. code-centered thinking
>>>the unresolvable heart of the conflict.
>>
>>So, in this entire discussion, have you seen me attack database theory
>>even once?
> > No, but I have seen you be dismissive of ideas that someone capable of a > data centered viewpoint would probably not have dismissed.
And we have seen him prove his ignorance beyond any doubt while promoting himself. Received on Wed Mar 12 2008 - 15:07:23 CET