Re: Object-relational impedence

From: Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <026db19e-4064-4b37-a98e-0826695ed5a7_at_s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com>

On Mar 10, 10:47 am, "Yagotta B. Kidding" <y..._at_mymail.com> wrote:
> > Mr. Perryman's example was written in a single-assignment,
> > mathematical style.
>
> And yet you still do not see where the assignment comes in in Mr.
> Perryman's example.

You understand that single-assignment is different from assignment, right? You know that single-assignment doesn't cause any problems with referential transparency, right?

Well, we're into a subpoint of a subpoint of a subpoint. Perhaps a refreshing Snapple is in order!

Marshall Received on Mon Mar 10 2008 - 20:30:50 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bob Badour: "Re: Mixing OO and DB"
Previous message: paul c: "Re: Object-relational impedence"
Maybe in reply to: JOG: "Object-relational impedence"
In reply to Marshall: "Re: Object-relational impedence"
Next in thread: TroyK: "Re: Object-relational impedence"
Reply: Yagotta B. Kidding: "Re: Object-relational impedence"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message