Re: Mixing OO and DB
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:06:15 -0400
Message-ID: <47cdd5eb$0$4068$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>>On 2008-03-03 11:04:14 -0600, topmind <topm..._at_technologist.com> said:
>>
>>
>>>The Clutter Tax of wrapping is there for almost every maintenance
>>>transaction
>>
>>Your penchant for sloganeering evokes tedium.
>>Wrapping query results into objects can sometimes be more work than
>>it's worth. Other times it saves a great deal of work because of the
>>increase of abstraction level.
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:06:15 -0400
Message-ID: <47cdd5eb$0$4068$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
topmind wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2:19 pm, Robert Martin <uncle..._at_objectmentor.com> wrote: >
>>On 2008-03-03 11:04:14 -0600, topmind <topm..._at_technologist.com> said:
>>
>>
>>>The Clutter Tax of wrapping is there for almost every maintenance
>>>transaction
>>
>>Your penchant for sloganeering evokes tedium.
> > > I'll take that as a compliment. > >
>>Wrapping query results into objects can sometimes be more work than
>>it's worth. Other times it saves a great deal of work because of the
>>increase of abstraction level.
Increase? What an idiot! That's like increasing the abstraction of an OOPL by wrapping it in assembler.
[response to the red herring snipped] Received on Wed Mar 05 2008 - 00:06:15 CET