Re: Mixing OO and DB
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:36:19 -0400
Message-ID: <47cc7d7a$0$4071$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>
> As I said elsewhere, Stalinists versus Trotskyites.
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:36:19 -0400
Message-ID: <47cc7d7a$0$4071$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
David Cressey wrote:
> "topmind" <topmind_at_technologist.com> wrote in message
> news:11fde848-94cc-4bc4-9df9-3c105c2366b7_at_s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
>>What OO designs often do is *funnel* the view a given app developer >>has. (It can be done without OO also, but that's another topic.) >>They'll have an Employee object/class and the rules of encapsulation >>say: "These are the methods and the *only* methods you can use to >>access the Employee object. All Employee operations must go through >>them". Any new operations require going through the Interface Police >>(who go by various job titles, such as Chief Architect).
>
> As I said elsewhere, Stalinists versus Trotskyites.
Are you sure they aren't big endians versus little endians?
> Incidentally, DBAs or Data Architects can become Stalinists just as easily
> as Chief Architects.
Absolutely. Received on Mon Mar 03 2008 - 23:36:19 CET