Re: Useful Unicode
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:43:30 +0100
Message-ID: <47967ed0$0$85792$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
>> Bob Badour quoted all of the message, including
>>
>>>> references: レ
>>>> references unique: ル
>>>> masterdam smiley : ☺
>> to write:
>>
>>> Refernces and references unique both come out as
>>> question marks on this end.
>> If I did not know better, I'd suggest that this
>> has to do with overzealous twitfiltersettings.
>>
>> It is remarkable, that the Unicode /does/ come through
>> nicely in his message, so my real guess is that the
>> font he uses for display does not have the Japanese characters.
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:43:30 +0100
Message-ID: <47967ed0$0$85792$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
JOG schreef:
> mAsterdam wrote:
>> Bob Badour quoted all of the message, including
>>
>>>> references: レ
>>>> references unique: ル
>>>> masterdam smiley : ☺
>> to write:
>>
>>> Refernces and references unique both come out as
>>> question marks on this end.
>> If I did not know better, I'd suggest that this
>> has to do with overzealous twitfiltersettings.
>>
>> It is remarkable, that the Unicode /does/ come through
>> nicely in his message, so my real guess is that the
>> font he uses for display does not have the Japanese characters.
> > Mmmm, I was partly interested in how universal these codes are in > getting through people's news-readers. If they are only rendering on > google groups it hinders communication somewhat.
Agreed.
Bob's toolkit is allright (except the font) it seems, because the message came through undistorted from his box even though he could not see レ and ル.
Let's see how far Unicode has spread in this group.
I am using Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (20071031). All is well, both on Linux and Windows. Received on Wed Jan 23 2008 - 00:43:30 CET