Re: One-To-One Relationships
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_ooyah.ac>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 02:38:31 GMT
Message-ID: <HIK3j.74278$cD.9309_at_pd7urf2no>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 02:38:31 GMT
Message-ID: <HIK3j.74278$cD.9309_at_pd7urf2no>
JOG wrote:
...
>
> There are a load of atoms. Someone else looks at them and says hey its
> a dead bit of wood, its a 'stump' entity. Someone else considers a
> bigger picture and says its a snapshot of a 'tree' entity. Me, being
> lazy, say hey I could sit on that, its a 'seat' entity, etc., ad
> infinitum.
> ...
(Not trying to be a smart-ass): By your definition, could the orbits of electrons be database entities? Could a number be an entity? Could a legal entity that is owned by another legal entity be an entity in the same sense as a number could be? Received on Fri Nov 30 2007 - 03:38:31 CET
