Re: delete cascade

Bob Badour wrote:
> paul c wrote:
>

...

>>> I understand how it expresses the constraint. What does that have to 
>>> do with cascading, though?
>>
>>
>> It would prevent the deletion of invoice 99 and thus any cascade 
>> unless there were no items for invoice 99.  (assuming a system that 
>> always cascades deletions, ie., one that has no "cascade" keyword.)

Oh, alright Bob, if you want to be that way, it always cascades when it deletes! (I feel as if I'm attending a council meeting, the one Date mentioned where they spent some time how to say that a dog in a park must be leashed.)

Don't mind my exasperation, I'm grateful for the comments.

p Received on Tue Apr 17 2007 - 23:25:25 CEST