Re: choice of character for relational division

On Apr 1, 3:00 pm, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
> David Cressey wrote:
>
> > > ... all the good operators have been taken!
>
> > I'm just picking up on this now. Did the author mean "all the good symbols
> > have been taken" instead of "all the good operators have been taken"?
>
> Operators are symbols by definition. He didn't say that all the good
> operations have been taken.

All the good nonalphabetic symbols used to represent functions typically via infix notation but sometimes for prefix or suffix have been previously owned?

Marshall

PS. But are protected by our extended warranty? Received on Mon Apr 02 2007 - 01:00:45 CEST