Re: An object-oriented network DBMS from relational DBMS point of view

On 18 mar, 18:18, "Marshall" <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 18, 3:05 am, "Drago Ganic" <dga..._at_vodatel.net> wrote:

> My take on the well-definedness of the term "object" is slightly
> different than Bob's. I would say that in fact, the term "object"
> is quite well defined--in a number of different places, each with
> a different way. The C++ standard has one, the Java Language
> Spec has one,

Let's see.

4.3.1 Objects
An object is a class instance or an array.

http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/typesValues.html#4.3.1

No, it is not quite well defined.

Regards
  Alfredo Received on Mon Mar 19 2007 - 00:33:43 CET