Re: Objects and Relations

On 20 fév, 06:52, Gene Wirchenko <g..._at_ocis.net> wrote:
> "Cimode" <cim..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On 19 fév, 02:52, paul c <toledobythe..._at_oohay.ac> wrote:
> >> Cimode wrote:
>
> >> > *savages*? Is there a need for such etymology from another time?
> >> sure there is when there is so much unnecessary overkill here.
> >As every action provokes a reaction, I do not believe in randomness of
>
> ^^^^^^^^
>
> >conflict. At some point in time, there is indeed a shared
> >responsability over a conflict.
>
> It is your choice to react. You could choose to ignore the post,
> kill-file the poster, or something else.
I was a little puzzled by the etymology used bur I finally realized that I should not be surprised. The influence of an elitist group (in the worst sense) of people who have no paticular talent or intelligence is basically hurting any chance to discuss intelligently RM . That is why I choose to expose some posts that take a judgmental tone over others to reveal the incoherence of the judges: a warning to readers. People such as BB, Marshall have a very limited understanding of RM but they behave in such a self sufficient and indulging manner that they finally do not worth any better than the people they criticize. Just more arrogant. Received on Tue Feb 20 2007 - 08:15:49 CET