Re: Navigation question

On Feb 16, 11:12 am, "dawn" <dawnwolth..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 16, 11:16 am, "Marshall" <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 16, 8:34 am, "dawn" <dawnwolth..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 16, 9:48 am, "Marshall" <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > They
> > > have the same number of queries. How many times do I have to say that
> > > I am not, not, not, absolutely not suggesting that we do more round
> > > trips or split queries.
>
> > You split a query.
>
> No, I did not. I took your two queries and replaced them with my two
> queries. Please re-read or point me to where I have split a query.
> Thanks. --dawn
>

You replaced the second of Marshall's queries with your two queries. You
split it. Marshall's second query can stand on its own in order to obtain
the contact information given the customer name. Neither of your two queries
is sufficient on their own to obtain the same data. One query became two,
hence, it was "split".

TroyK Received on Fri Feb 16 2007 - 20:59:20 CET