Re: Nulls, integrity, the closed world assumption and events

Walt wrote:
> "dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1168966726.317308.322230_at_l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > Walt wrote:
> > > "dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:1168882079.488314.138100_at_51g2000cwl.googlegroups.com...
> > > > Walt wrote:
> > > > > "dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:1168831761.571396.308030_at_11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > > Marshall wrote:
> > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > > Sure. And since you are of the opinion that theory can steer us
> down
> > > > > > > the wrong path, and since you regularly deprecate relational
> theory
> > > > > > > but do not provide an alternative *theory*, I wonder at your
> > > presence
> > > > > > > in a theory newsgroup.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If I had another comprehensive theory, I would not have so many
> > > > > > questions or opinions that I want to pass by those who can correct
> me.
> > > > >
> > > > > No one can correct you.
> > > >
> > > > Many have, Walt, but thanks for the thought.
> > >
> > > Many have attempted, but you have been expounding on the same incorrect
> > > ideas for something like five years now.
> >
> > Could you point me to proof that something I expound is incorrect?
> > Perhaps just starting by telling me what I think to be true that you
> > think false, or vice versa, would be helpful. I would very much
> > appreciate knowing.
> >
> this ground has already been covered by others. I see no need to cover it
> again.

No, brother, it hasn't -- just various insults, opinions about my intelligence or lack thereof, and suggestions that whatever it is has been covered by others. I do not know what you think I have wrong. If you have a straight answer, it would be appreciated, otherwise your comments have simply been derogatory without any content from which I or anyone else can learn. I would hope that was not your intent, so please take the opportunity to rectify this, if only to give me one fact that is agreed upon by everyone else, but that I am missing. Thanks in advance. --dawn Received on Tue Jan 16 2007 - 21:36:26 CET