Re: Concurrency in an RDB

Bob Badour a écrit :

> Marshall wrote:
>
> > On Dec 14, 3:22 pm, "Cimode" <cim..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>I have never stated that locks put on objects can not cause deadlocks
> >>to happen.
> >
> > So your position is:
> >
> > 1) There is NO direct relationship between locks and deadlocks.
> > 2) Locks put on objects can cause deadlocks.
> >
> > Well. The More You Know.

> >>A lock is a normal mechanism and is not the real
> >>cause of the deadlock problem which lies more on the IO/disk swapping
> >>contention of ressources. A matter of perspective, idiots like
> >>Marshall will probably not perceive in a lifetime.
> >
> > Deadlock is caused by disk swapping, you say? You are
> > right; I do not see me being able to perceive this any
> > time soon.
>
> Not even with the Romper Room magic looking glass! I see Cimode! And
> Neo! And...
Youhou!!! I am happy I could be of any help !!! Received on Fri Dec 15 2006 - 10:24:30 CET