Re: Generalised approach to storing address details
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:40:02 GMT
Message-ID: <CTmfh.31712$cz.473523_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
> I would like to know how the RM handles hierarchies, without the aid of
> a builtin such as TTM's TCLOSE that is essentially outside the scope of
> the RM (eg., it seems to me that it does a transformation that can't be
> couched in fundamental RM terms.)
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:40:02 GMT
Message-ID: <CTmfh.31712$cz.473523_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
paul c wrote:
> Neo wrote:
> ...
>
>>> You think that RM can't handle hierachies after I answered your >>> demand on the *Brothers and Sisters* thread with a simple structure >>> that perfectly met your criterias? >> >> It is not that RM can't handle hierarchies, ...
>
> I would like to know how the RM handles hierarchies, without the aid of
> a builtin such as TTM's TCLOSE that is essentially outside the scope of
> the RM (eg., it seems to me that it does a transformation that can't be
> couched in fundamental RM terms.)
Um, so you want to know how it handles it but not the way it handles it. Okay, it handles it with recursion. Received on Tue Dec 12 2006 - 01:40:02 CET