Re: Proposal: 6NF
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 23:35:05 +0200
Message-ID: <bjidi29k8crgbrh536l9t3et41chha1i1n_at_4ax.com>
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 08:32:36 GMT, Brian Selzer wrote:
>
>"JOG" <jog_at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote in message
>news:1159970386.339044.87090_at_i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> Brian Selzer wrote:
>>> "JOG" <jog_at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:1159954091.119164.155490_at_m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>>> > All of your points represent a wild goose chase in my eyes Brian. A
>>> > proposition with a NULL in it is no proposition at all. From a logical
>>> > perspective, case closed. A relation tuple with a NULL in it is no
>>> > relation tuple at all. From a mathematical perspective, case closed.
>>> > Trying to invoke the 'kludge perspective' is hardly going to convince a
>>> > theoretical newsgroup.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Is the empty set a value? Yes, it is. So why can't a null be?
>>
>> Because an empty set is a value and a NULL is not.
>>
>
>Why not?
Hi Brian,
But since this is a discussion about relational databases, I'll assume
the standard definition of NULL for relational databases unless you
(snip)
>The empty set /indicates/ the absence of a value, yet it /is/ a value; a
>null /indicates/ the absence of a value, yet it /isn't/ a value? Why the
>double standard?
Wrong. The empty set *IS* a value. It's domain is the domain of sets. A set is a value that can hold zero, one or more values of a specified domain. The empty set happens to hold a zero number of values.
NULL is a marker that says "no value here". If NULL would appear in a column that is defined to use datatype "set" (not sure if any product supports it and not sure if I'd want it, but bear with me), then it would still be different from an empty set. Kinda like the difference between "the suitcase is empty" and "where's the &*(^^%#$ suitcase!"
Best, Hugo Received on Fri Oct 06 2006 - 23:35:05 CEST