comp.databases.theory: by thread

Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? paul c (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 00:29:54 CEST)
- Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? Bob Badour (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 00:49:25 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? Chris Smith (Sat Sep 23 2006 - 15:35:13 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? vc (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 02:09:03 CEST)
- Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? pamelafluente_at_libero.it (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 11:42:50 CEST)
  - Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? vc (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 14:52:54 CEST)
    - Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? pamelafluente_at_libero.it (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 16:10:38 CEST)
      - Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? vc (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 17:18:20 CEST)
        
        Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? pamelafluente_at_libero.it (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 17:34:09 CEST)
        
        Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? vc (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 17:56:54 CEST)
        
        Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? pamelafluente_at_libero.it (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 18:28:36 CEST)
        
        Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? vc (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 19:09:35 CEST)
        
        Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? pamelafluente_at_libero.it (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 19:36:27 CEST)
        
        Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? vc (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 20:21:37 CEST)
        
        Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? pamelafluente_at_libero.it (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 21:31:36 CEST)
        
        Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? vc (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 21:48:01 CEST)
        
        Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? pamelafluente_at_libero.it (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 22:08:21 CEST)
        
        Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? vc (Wed Sep 27 2006 - 05:31:14 CEST)
        
        Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? Marshall (Wed Sep 27 2006 - 06:24:13 CEST)
        
        Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? pamelafluente_at_libero.it (Wed Sep 27 2006 - 08:40:04 CEST)
        Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? pamelafluente_at_libero.it (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 22:16:56 CEST)
  - Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? vc (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 15:38:01 CEST)
    - Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? pamelafluente_at_libero.it (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 16:45:47 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? Marshall (Mon Sep 25 2006 - 17:34:06 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ? Jan Hidders (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 09:56:06 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ? David Cressey (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 14:31:22 CEST)
Re: Order details table reference live data vldm10 (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 20:23:18 CEST)
- Re: Order details table reference live data Bob Badour (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 20:54:15 CEST)
- Re: Order details table reference live data JOG (Wed Sep 27 2006 - 15:48:24 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ? Brian Selzer (Wed Sep 27 2006 - 10:07:13 CEST)
re:updatableViews Rick Elbers (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 18:32:54 CEST)
- Re: re:updatableViews Aloha Kakuikanu (Tue Sep 26 2006 - 18:44:09 CEST)

Last message date: Tue Sep 26 2006 - 22:16:56 CEST
Archived on: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 20:37:40 CEST

25 messages sort by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ]
Other periods:[ Previous, Thread view ] [ Next, Thread view ] [ List of Folders ]
Nearby: [ About this archive ] [ Other mail archives ]