Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
From: Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: 23 Sep 2006 10:49:05 -0700
Message-ID: <1159033745.680121.83430_at_i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
Date: 23 Sep 2006 10:49:05 -0700
Message-ID: <1159033745.680121.83430_at_i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
vc wrote:
> Marshall wrote:
> >
> > 1) Notice that everything the least bit technical that Pamela
> > comes up with has a corresponding wikipedia entry.
>
> Is quoting Wikipedia a sin?
However: pretending to know things you don't; the reverse of playing dumb for effect, provocation for one's own entertainment, and pretending to be a woman, these are all greater or lesser sins.
> Are you saying that the entry in question
> is incorrect ?
>
> I am not sure how derived the rest of your conclusions.
I will admit there is an element of induction in my point 5).
Marshall Received on Sat Sep 23 2006 - 19:49:05 CEST