Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem

>
> Johnny wrote:
> > <snip>
> > >Classical REAL WORLD vs THEORY
> > > argument...(heard that a zillion times) Practice
> > > guided by ignorance leads to one thing and one thing
> > > only which is failure of systems. It is because
> > > ignorants like you design systems that we have to do
> > compromises... Can you point me to some examples of your
> > production databases where ignorants haven't bastardized
> > your solution? Do ignorants include Oracle, IBM, etc?
> Typical idiot who can't think out of a product approach...
> SQL, ORACLE, DB2 are nothing but poor implementations of
> sound concepts...They are nt even relational DBMS's. If
> you were not such a moron you would know that before
> asking such idiotic question and hope some answer...
>
Actually I was hoping that there would be some relevance to the theory proposed here to actual work that I have to put into production. Many of the posts on surrogate keys and other topics I have found helpful in designing logical solutions. If nothing you propose can be used in a common commerical database product then I guess I am a moron for bothering you. Accept my apologies. Received on Thu Sep 14 2006 - 02:07:24 CEST