Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Date: 12 Sep 2006 14:11:22 -0700
Message-ID: <1158095482.768051.87060_at_h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
Cimode ha scritto:
> pamelafluente_at_libero.it wrote:
> > David Cressey ha scritto:
> > > On the subject of ignorance, I find that the more I learn, the more of my
> > > own ignorance I become aware of.
> > >
> >
> > What we know is such an insignificant part of what we don't that there
> > is not even point
> > to compare our ignorances.
> Blah, blah...And the sky is blue and the fish swim...Go play philosophy
> on comp.idophilosophybecauseIknowshitabuotdatamanagement.
Hi Bob,
I made you some question. Are you only capable to tell others they are ignorants, or do you also intend some help through this newsgroup?
I may not know technical terms because a twofold reason: a theoretical ignorance and an idiom language, but I do have real world problems, not phylosophy, which you can help with, if you will.
So are you able to suggest a good "split" algorithm. Let me know if I was not able to explain the terms of the problem. I would try to state it better. Is that a problem that is denoted with some specific term in the theory?
-P Received on Tue Sep 12 2006 - 23:11:22 CEST