Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside

3 simple questions...

What exactly is the purpose of your revolutionnary technology? What kind of complexity is your technology able to handle when it comes to data types?
How do you derive values from domains of values in an ensemblist perspective (for instance odd integers from integers)?

Dmitry Shuklin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Give just ONE example. I sincerely doubt there is anything you can do
> > in a network model DB that cannot be done at least as well in a
> > Relational model DB.
>
> Trees )) I think You understand what I mean. Of course on the same
> abstraction level as the relational model works. You can emulate trees
> on RMD. But it will cause more abstraction levels to appear.
>
> In fact i am interested in emulation of artificial neural network.
> Making ANN with SQL - ha ha ha.
>
> > Sorry, but all I see on that page is a couple claims, no supporting
> > data. I will not download some unknown executable. Make a case without
> > having us run your program for you.
>
> Sorry, i don't have any artiles on English describing my OODB research
> yet (((
> And even when you download zip you can find there only C# sources. no
> documentation (((
>
> I know, i know (((
>
> What differ my DB from the rest? :
>
> - one object can have a many ObjectIDs
> - one ObjectID can address many different object instances
> - multilevel undo/redo transactions are supported
>
> What restrictions current version has?
> - only single user mode.
> - only single thread.
>
>
> WBR,
> Dmitry
Received on Mon Jul 03 2006 - 19:54:08 CEST