Re: Microsoft's bridge between OO and relational

From: JXStern <JXSternChangeX2R_at_gte.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 21:21:24 GMT
Message-ID: <41v38291agd6d1lc4ae1317b3gkn84l1j8_at_4ax.com>


On Sat, 03 Jun 2006 14:47:08 -0400, Kenneth Downs <knode.wants.this_at_see.sigblock> wrote:
>Kirk: "hey, you've got two jacks, and its Tuesday, that's a DOUBLE FIZBIT!"
>
>...and so on and so on.

Hmm, compare:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fizzbin

vs

http://msdn.microsoft.com/data/ref/linq/

I dunno, I'd heard about this Linq back when and lost track of it, and now here it is, gee whiz.

My first impression is that it might be a Good Thing, if only because it encourages a "bridge" to complex and dynamic queries, not this-class-is-a-table "mappings".

But I did read that lead paragraph and was reminded of Trek, only more like "Shaka, when the walls fell."

 :)

J. Received on Sat Jun 03 2006 - 23:21:24 CEST

Original text of this message