Re: Process Model

From: Kenneth Downs <knode.wants.this_at_see.sigblock>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 07:40:01 -0400
Message-Id: <9en0k3-6af.ln1_at_pluto.downsfam.net>


David Cressey wrote:

>
> "The underlying strategy of functional decomposition consists of selecting
> the processing steps and sub-steps anticipated for a new system. Analysts
> use previous experience from similar systems, combined at times with an
> examination of required outputs. The focus is on what processing is
> required for the new system. The analyst then specifieas the processing
> and functional interfaces."
>
> As far as I can tell, functional decomposition results in a process model.
>
> Every information system I've dealt with was, at some stage of its
> development, described by a process model and a data model. Sometimes
> these
> models were implicit and non verbalized, but they were models
> nonetheless.

It seems to me the process model is not strictly necessary for the foundation of a system. When a programmer speaks of "process steps" they usually start talking about reading data, doing calculations, then writing data.

IMHO, if you can define derivations as part of the table design, you eliminate the need for most processes. The only exceptions I've run across are certain processes like ERP allocation where each row write affects tables in such a way that a loop is apparently required. Also in some import/export routines where the desired target format makes it more economical to write up some code than to dream up a generalized solution.

But in your classical processes like billing and cash posting, the ability to specify derived values can eliminate posting processes entirely.

So, once the process is recast as table definitions, outside process code becomes more like UI code, something that can easily cobbled together to trigger events in the database, but its not a foundation design element anymore.

I should also point out that I've considered making use of table specifications to generate server-side processes, so that automatic derivations can be delayed and run on-demand. It seemed like a good idea for comleteness, but nobody yet has asked me to do it, so it just sits on the shelf as an idea.

-- 
Kenneth Downs
Secure Data Software, Inc.
(Ken)nneth_at_(Sec)ure(Dat)a(.com)
Received on Fri May 19 2006 - 13:40:01 CEST

Original text of this message