Re: circular relationships ok?

From: Roy Hann <specially_at_processed.almost.meat>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 10:24:14 -0000
Message-ID: <ovOdnZLhUrvFVZvZRVny0A_at_pipex.net>


"Alexandr Savinov" <spam_at_conceptoriented.com> wrote in message news:4406c332$1_at_news.fhg.de...
> Roy Hann schrieb:

> >> Querying, grouping/aggregation,
> >> inference are also made easier in such an approach.
> >
> > I just don't believe that. Persuade me.
>
> If you do not believe then nobody can persuade you (except for yourself).

Rubbish. I refuse to believe; I don't refuse to be persuaded.

> The only thing I can do is to answer concrete questions.

You've made an assertion that I find implausible. If I spent my time trying to get to the bottom of all the things people insist are true yet which I see no obvious reason to expect really are true, I'd get nowhere. Come on, give me at least a one paragraph case for why I should take the slightest interest in what is at first glance just a fantasy.

Roy Received on Thu Mar 02 2006 - 11:24:14 CET

Original text of this message