Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms
From: x <x_at_not-exists.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 17:34:57 +0200
Message-ID: <du4f4k$88b$1_at_emma.aioe.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 17:34:57 +0200
Message-ID: <du4f4k$88b$1_at_emma.aioe.org>
"dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1141225670.722143.166220_at_v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
> But if there is a significant difference in
But if there is a significant difference in
quality and cost and if high level languages can be general purpose
languages, then why are so many people still coding with assembler languages
> quality and cost and if declarative languages can be general purpose
> languages, then why are so many people still coding with "imperative"
> languages? I think there must be good reasons. What are the problems
> of using declarative languages?
I think there must be good reasons. What are the problems
of using high level languages?
Received on Wed Mar 01 2006 - 16:34:57 CET