Re: MV Keys
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 16:48:41 +0100
Message-ID: <4401cd8b$0$11062$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
>>dawn wrote:
>>
>>>... What does it mean that a list is a key? If
>>>I change one value in the list, does that make it a new key? I would
>>>think so.
>>
>>If I change the order of the items in the list,
>>does that make it a new key? I would think so. (See below)
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 16:48:41 +0100
Message-ID: <4401cd8b$0$11062$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
dawn wrote:
> mAsterdam wrote: >
>>dawn wrote:
>>
>>>... What does it mean that a list is a key? If
>>>I change one value in the list, does that make it a new key? I would
>>>think so.
>>
>>If I change the order of the items in the list,
>>does that make it a new key? I would think so. (See below)
> > > Yes, I too often mix sets & lists when I think in terms of the MV data > model, which has only list attributes in which conceptual sets & lists > are both implemented.
>>>It might model a proposition something like
>>>
>>>The team with people whose ID's are 112233 and 123456 has a best run of
>>>38 seconds in the potato sack race.
>>
>>The team with people whose ID's are 123456 and 112233 has a best run of
>>38 seconds in the potato sack race.
>>
>>Would be the same proposition, right?
>>
>>So, in this example we have a set-key, not a list-key.
> > > Yes, unless we add to the proposition so that it matters who's on top > -- perhaps that person is the lead person, the one we want to contact, > the one whose left leg is in the sack, the parent...Received on Sun Feb 26 2006 - 16:48:41 CET