Re: How are OO databases doing

From: Arturo Hernandez <arthernan_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 15 Feb 2006 10:10:02 -0800
Message-ID: <1140027002.524877.270820_at_z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>

>OO "databases" are just network model databases in new clothes. The data
>model is clumsy, inefficient and difficult to work with.

>It's no surprise the market rejected them.

I share your opinion on network databases. If we look at the problem from a broader perpective. Development on the client is still done with

OO langages. And for developers like me it is still a pain not to have an integrated technology. So why the disconect? Why did OO databases fail in the market?

PD. OK, now the posting makes more sense Received on Wed Feb 15 2006 - 19:10:02 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Christopher Browne: "Re: How are OO databases doing"
Previous message: Arturo Hernandez: "Re: How are OO databases doing"
In reply to Bob Badour: "Re: How are OO databases doing"
Next in thread: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: How are OO databases doing"
Reply: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: How are OO databases doing"
Reply: Volker Hetzer: "Re: How are OO databases doing"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message