Re: What does this NULL mean?
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:38:18 GMT
Message-ID: <_V2of.523$V7.396_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au>
"Alfredo Novoa" <alfredo_novoa_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1134574071.843808.11170_at_g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> "mountain man" <hobbit_at_southern_seaweed.com.op> wrote
>
>>Theorists like Date who think the null should be rationalised
>>out of existence have no demonstrated understanding of the
>>database change management environment,
>
> Database design maintenance has nothing in special.
Well then neither does the original database design. One is just as critical as the other.
>We should be able
> to manage the schema applying the usual relational operators on the
> catalog relvars, besides the shorthands like: drop Table, etc.
Change management is able to be managed. Yes.
>> and specifically
>>the management of schema evolution and its consequences
>>in regard to the generation of nulls.
>
> They are completely independent issues. Nulls are a mistake
That is simply your opinion. Nulls being a mistake is Date's mistake, and fortunately Codd never agreed with Date.
> and schema
> maintenance is something elemental and straighforward.
It obviously depends upon the actual maintenance being conducted, and simplistic sayings like the one above should be ignored except by poets.
>>Change management or schema evolution is not adequately
>>addressed by Date et al,
>
> It is sufficiently addressed, but it is so trivial that there is little
> to say about it.
>> however by the time they set forth
>>the processes covered under this subject, it will become very
>>apparent that the NULL will never be rationalised away, and
>>it is better to therefore appropriately manage its identification,
>>its existence and its resolution interactively.
>
> Plain nonsenses.
I will defer response on this pluralistic phrase until you have answered the question above ---- if you are able to do so.
-- Pete Brown IT Managers & Engineers Falls Creek Australia www.mountainman.com.au/softwareReceived on Thu Dec 15 2005 - 01:38:18 CET
