Re: ACID et al

"vc" <boston103_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1133867370.295735.64380_at_f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Daniel Dittmar wrote:
> [...]
> > But the database engines still need row level locking (database engines
> > using page level locking were not scalable enough). While db locks might
> > be less relevant in certain parts of the system, they seem to be still
> > very important in others.
> >
> > Daniel
>
> Did you read what the OP actually wrote ? He does not need any
> concurrency control as access to the DB is serial.

No. He doesn't said that. He said the access to the DB is concurrent, but this doesn't matter because the applications are working correctly anyway and is not the bussiness of the DBMS engine to strangle them but to do what is asked to and help them if he can. Received on Tue Dec 06 2005 - 14:07:22 CET