Re: Theoretical Basis for SELECT FOR UPDATE
From: Misha Dorman <misha_at_no_mishapen_spam.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 23:09:16 +0100
Message-ID: <11kb7rbkb90djc3_at_corp.supernews.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 23:09:16 +0100
Message-ID: <11kb7rbkb90djc3_at_corp.supernews.com>
vc wrote:
> SELECT FOR UPDATE is not needed for databases with a locking
> concurrency scheduler (SQL Sever, etc) and consequently not
> implemented there.
So why does SQL Server (6.5 up) provide
SELECT .. FROM tablename (UPDLOCK)
It is (as someone else pointed out) useful to avoid some forms of
?