Re: Implementation of boolean types.
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 06:13:07 GMT
Message-ID: <TLHCe.266970$El.129856_at_pd7tw1no>
>
> ...
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 06:13:07 GMT
Message-ID: <TLHCe.266970$El.129856_at_pd7tw1no>
Drago Ganic wrote:
> Paul,
> --> means "results after evaluation in". For example: 1+3 --> 4.
>
> Instead of "-->" we could *not* use "=" (equals, because this is a logical
> operator) or ":=" (assignment, becuase of obvious reasons).
>
> drago
> P.S: I made a typo [as I always do :-( ... ] and forgot the operator SUM in
> my second example:
>
>>>>y = 1+x --> 1+x >>>>y - x --> 1 >>>> >>>>z = SUM (1,1,x) --> 2 + x >>>>z - x -->2
>
> ...
thanks, Drago. now i think i can follow what you're talking about. not sure if i get it yet, but this is the kind of thread in this group that intrigues me.
paul c. Received on Mon Jul 18 2005 - 08:13:07 CEST