Re: SQL, related records (quotes)
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 00:21:29 +0200
Message-ID: <42bc8769$0$38881$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
>
>
>
> Consider adding these constraints: QuoteNo as key,
> and PreviousQuoteNo as foreign key to QuoteNo.
>
> Only now we have the intended tree-consistency.
> The circular states mentioned above are inconsistent with the
> constraints, and I can't add these values by hand or by algorithm.
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 00:21:29 +0200
Message-ID: <42bc8769$0$38881$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
mAsterdam wrote:
> Stefan Rybacki wrote:
>
>> mAsterdam wrote: >> >>> Jan Hidders wrote: >>> >>>> Stefan Rybacki wrote: >>>> >>>>> timpea_at_gmail.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I have a website that users can request quotes, and a user may also >>>>>> make a new quote that links to a previous quote. >>>>>> >>>>>> QuoteNo PreviousQuoteNo >>>>>> 1 >>>>>> 2 >>>>>> 3 1 >>>>>> 4 3 >>>>>> 5 4 >>>>>> >>>>>> If i request quoteNo 3 i want to have a list of all the related >>>>>> quotes. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> RelQuote >>>>>> 1 >>>>>> 3 >>>>>> 4 >>>>>> 5 >>>>>> >>>>>> Is this possible with a SQL statement? or would i be best doing a >>>>>> loop >>>>>> in asp and many requests? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Try the nested sets model. >>>> >>>> >>>> Are you sure the relation describes always a tree? >>> >>> >>> Values like >>> QuoteNo PreviousQuoteNo >>> 3 6 >>> 6 3 >>> >>> or just >>> QuoteNo PreviousQuoteNo >>> 3 3 >>> >>> are possible, so no tree. The columnnames suggest the OP does not >>> want this to happen. They don't help to prevent these loops though. >> >> >> >> >> That is true but these are inconsitent states. Its clear that you can >> create those table values by hand but think about it in algorithmic way: >> >> you want to create a quote with QuoteNo=3 so how can you say its >> parent is QuoteNo=6 since there is no quote with this number. Ok >> somebody can say what if QuoteNo=6 is already existing. Ok we go from >> there so how could this quote (6) have known from QuoteNo=3? since we >> are currently creating it?
>
>
>
> Consider adding these constraints: QuoteNo as key,
> and PreviousQuoteNo as foreign key to QuoteNo.
>
> Only now we have the intended tree-consistency.
> The circular states mentioned above are inconsistent with the
> constraints, and I can't add these values by hand or by algorithm.
Oops - still not good enough. Received on Sat Jun 25 2005 - 00:21:29 CEST