Re: Evolution of Date's "Abstract Machine" (via CM)

From: mountain man <hobbit_at_southern_seaweed.com.op>
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 00:45:49 GMT
Message-ID: <1R6oe.1960$F7.337_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au>

"Robin Tucker" <idontwanttobespammedanymore_at_reallyidont.com> wrote in message news:d7n338$l1u$1$830fa17d_at_news.demon.co.uk...
>
>>> Thanks for any comments,
>>
>>
>>> Please, keep your mental masturbation in private.
>>
>>
>> Let me make a revision to that last comment of mine.
>> Thanks for any constructive comments.
>>
>> I believe the subject matter for discussion in this forum
>> is database theory, but I could be mistaken.
>>
>
>
> Are you an AI experiment?

GIGO.
> Your original post seemed to be a gigantic manure pile of incomprehensible
> rubbish.

Including the "direct quotes" from CJ Date? (Maybe your confusing authors?)

You've obviously never considered before the term "schema evolution".

> Mental masturbation is quite an appropriate term I think.

Well, you and your good buddy Alfrogo would know all about that.

Have a nice day

-- 
Pete Brown
Falls Creek
OZ
www.mountainman.com.au

Received on Sat Jun 04 2005 - 02:45:49 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jan Hidders: "Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that of Date & Darwin? [M.Gittens]"
Previous message: mountain man: "Re: theory and practice: ying and yang"
Maybe in reply to: Robin Tucker: "Re: Evolution of Date's "Abstract Machine" (via CM)"
In reply to Robin Tucker: "Re: Evolution of Date's "Abstract Machine" (via CM)"
Next in thread: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Evolution of Date's "Abstract Machine" (via CM)"
Reply: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Evolution of Date's "Abstract Machine" (via CM)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message