Re: Glossary 0.0.4 (repost)
From: Paul <paul_at_test.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 22:48:22 +0100
Message-ID: <42964426$0$2389$ed2619ec_at_ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 22:48:22 +0100
Message-ID: <42964426$0$2389$ed2619ec_at_ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>
mAsterdam wrote:
> None of these abbreviations have AFAIK ever led to misunderstandings in
> this newsgroup: FOLDOC, DBMS, ,ISO, RM, SQL-DBMS, IT, 3rdM, m.m., ER.
> I don't think these should be explained in this glossary.
Paul. Received on Thu May 26 2005 - 23:48:22 CEST