Re: deductive databases
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 11:59:20 +0200
Message-ID: <4285cbf6$0$64528$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 11:59:20 +0200
Message-ID: <4285cbf6$0$64528$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
mountain man wrote:
> In fact there are literally hundreds of alternative work-
<delurk>
Just curious:
</delurk>
> ...
[snip "recursion useful to solve part explosion problems"]
> arounds to this type of problem without involving
> any form of esoteric generalised recursion theory.
What is esoteric about it?
Or: What makes you look for alternatives?
> If you relied upon theory you'd have a problem.
> Fortunately there are viable practice-based
> alternatives in SQL.
Received on Sat May 14 2005 - 11:59:20 CEST