Re: Pearson-r in SQL
From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_mail.ocis.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 15:00:51 -0800
Message-ID: <2jsls0lsibqh6pnslp5v0cl8dn95uom78g_at_4ax.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 15:00:51 -0800
Message-ID: <2jsls0lsibqh6pnslp5v0cl8dn95uom78g_at_4ax.com>
"-CELKO-" <jcelko212_at_earthlink.net> wrote:
>Add more data to the set, drop the columns with NULLs and now I can get
Why? The partial data does not say anything either way.
>just don't know what the SQL products like CA-Ingres are doing with
>a result. For example with four more rows:
>
>(3kg, 6m)
>(5kg, 10m)
>(7kg, 14m)
>(1kg, 2m)
>
>my known values are linear. But I have those other rows of partial
>data that should reduce my confidence that I really have (r = 1). I
>this, nor what statistics would do with it.
I would toss it. It is not valid data.
>I did drop a note at alt.sci.math.statistics as well as here.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences. You have biases. He/She has prejudices.Received on Fri Dec 24 2004 - 00:00:51 CET