Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted

"Costin Cozianu" <c_cozianu_at_hotmail.com>... <snip>
>
<snip troll-warning>

> Only after we established there was some formal model, we can discuss
> about the adequacy of approach.

> But to answer your question...
<answer snipped>
Thank you for your effort to answer my question. I'm sorry that I posed it in a way that gives the impression that an account on D&D's position is requested.
I did in fact already know and "understand" what Dates position is (and your presentation is very good), but my objective was to get Alfredo et al to give their OWN opinion, as does Mr. Gittens, to D&D's "logical conclusions" - eg. establish some formel basis for understanding the GB's (as D&D gives none).

I think I completely share yours and Jan Hidders views on the matter. Received on Tue Nov 23 2004 - 20:59:08 CET