Re: OT: Neos redundacy
From: Ja Lar <ingen_at_mail.her>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 22:10:39 +0100
Message-ID: <419e6153$0$297$edfadb0f_at_dread11.news.tele.dk>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 22:10:39 +0100
Message-ID: <419e6153$0$297$edfadb0f_at_dread11.news.tele.dk>
"Tom Ivar Helbekkmo" <tih+nr_at_eunetnorge.no> skrev i en meddelelse
news:86wtwh5z5h.fsf_at_athene.i.eunet.no...
> "Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> writes:
>
>>> Could we just short-circuit the whole thing by telling "Neo" that the
>>> semantics of its "XDb" is a brain-damaged version of Prolog, and that
>>> spending some time studying that language might be a good idea?
>>
>> That's been tried.
>
> Yup. By me. Could we try it again? ;-)
I propose we give him a chance and reason to keep quiet in stead of repeating like he does ... Received on Fri Nov 19 2004 - 22:10:39 CET