Re: Issues with the logical consistency of The Third Manifesto

From: Ja Lar <ingen_at_mail.her>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 19:50:39 +0100
Message-ID: <4198fa86$0$235$edfadb0f_at_dread11.news.tele.dk>

"Marshall Spight" ...

> OTOH I think the author really misses the point on his
> critique of the Second Great Blunder. (Shall we just
> call them 1GB and 2GB?) Pointerless programming is
> a big win.

How, more exact, do you find mr. Gittens misses the point in his critique of 2GB?
What, in your opinion, is the connection between OIDs, (surrogate)keys and pointers?
What do "pointerless programming" mean? Are you referring to eg. Java, where "nothing is a pointer, but everything is a reference"? Received on Mon Nov 15 2004 - 19:50:39 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Issues with the logical consistency of The Third Manifesto"
Previous message: Ja Lar: "Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted"
Maybe in reply to: Ja Lar: "Issues with the logical consistency of The Third Manifesto"
In reply to Marshall Spight: "Re: Issues with the logical consistency of The Third Manifesto"
Next in thread: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Issues with the logical consistency of The Third Manifesto"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message