Re: Demo: Things in Hierarchies (w/o RM/SQL)
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 01:23:06 +0000
Message-ID: <qu60p0lh5i0mk1nb0i7ire4kpsgjkepuo4_at_4ax.com>
On 8 Nov 2004 10:49:46 -0800, neo55592_at_hotmail.com (Neo) wrote:
>> The fact is that you issued a challenge, and promised to pay a
>> substantial sum to anyone who could meet it.
>
>Hugo's RM Solution #1 and #2 failed to meet the challenge because they
>are nearly twice as slow as XDb1's even when XDb1 is executed on 5.6X
>slower hardware. See measurements below. You are weclome to download
>XDb1 (www.xdb1/example/ex076.asp) and verify measurements against
>Hugo's solutions.
>
>Not only were Hugo's solutions slower, but there were not as generic
>or normalized. For instance, Hugo's solution cannot represent the
>following cases without NULLs or redundant data (XDb1's solution is
>normalized down to atomic symbols):
>
>Case1: God is the parent of an unnamed person. God is also the parent
>of second person with three names (string 'john', integer 100, decimal
>3.14).
>
>Case2: john isa person. john's color is brown. mary isa person. mary's
>color is brown. brown is a person.
> 
>As shown by the measurements made below, even when executed on a 5.6
>times slower 233 Mhz Pocket PC, XDb1 generated the small common
>ancestor report nearly twice as fast as Hugo's non-normalized,
>non-generic SQL Server 2000 Solution running on a 1,300 MHz desktop.
>
>Small Report Generation Summary (provided by Hugo)
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>Solution       Time(ms)  Platform          Notes
>-------------- --------  ----------------- --------------------------
>RM#1 SqlSrvr2K  14.3     1.3 Ghz PC        Unnormalized, non-generic
>RM#2 SqlSrvr2K  11.0     1.3 Ghz PC        Unnormalized, non-generic
>
>
>Small Report Generation Summary (provided by Neo)
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>Solution       Time(ms)  Platform          Notes
>-------------  --------  ----------------- --------------------------
>RM#1 SqlSrvr7   65.0     500 Mhz Server    Unnormalized, non-generic
>RM#2 SqlSrvr7   68.9     500 Mhz Server    Unnormalized, non-generic
>XDb1 4.5.7       1.632   500 Mhz Server    Normalized, generic
>XDb1 4.5.9       6.561   233 MHz PocketPC  Normalized, generic
>
>
>Large Report (28,940 rows) Generation Summary (provided by Neo) 
>200 Goat Hierarchy (5 generations x 40 goats/generation, 
>each goat having two parents, except 1st gen). 
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>Solution       Time(sec) Platform          Notes
>-------------  --------  ----------------- --------------------------
>RM#5 SqlSrvr7   40.5     500 Mhz Server    Unnormalized, non-generic
>XDb1 4.5.7       2.9     500 Mhz Server    Normalized, generic
>XDb1 4.5.9      16.971   233 Mhz PocketPC  Normalized, generic
>
>
>Larger Report (276,620 rows) Generation Summary (provided by Neo).
>400 Goat Hierarchy (10 gen x 40 goats/gen), 
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>Solution       Time(ms)  Platform          Notes
>-------------  --------  ----------------- --------------------------
>RM#5 SqlSrvr7  105 min   500 Mhz Srvr, NT  Avg of 2 runs, UnNrm,UnGen
>XDb1 4.5.10     44 min   500 Mhz Srvr, NT  Avg of 2 runs, Norm, gener
>XDb1 4.5.10     57 min   450 Mhz PC, 98    1 run, Normalized, generic
>XDb1 4.5.10    195 min   233 Mhz PocketPC  1 run, Normalized, generic
Copy and paste again, eh? Ok:
The fact is that you issued a challenge, and promised to pay a substantial sum to anyone who could meet it. Hugo met the challenge, and then you changed the rules. Hugo again met the new challenge, so you changed the rules again. You are in default, you know you are in default, and this makes you a fraud. Please pay Hugo and perhaps people will stop calling you a fraud.
Lemming
-- Curiosity *may* have killed Schrodinger's cat.Received on Tue Nov 09 2004 - 02:23:06 CET
