Re: By The Dawn's Normal Light
From: Kenneth Downs <firstinit.lastname_at_lastnameplusfam.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:26:58 -0400
Message-ID: <2r3plc.rdg.ln_at_mercury.downsfam.net>
>
> Yes. It need not be tables, but some way for the biz logic to be
> available
> to the full range of tiers in an application. --dawn
>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:26:58 -0400
Message-ID: <2r3plc.rdg.ln_at_mercury.downsfam.net>
Dawn M. Wolthuis wrote:
> "Kenneth Downs" <firstinit.lastname_at_lastnameplusfam.net> wrote in message
> news:1fuolc.gsf.ln_at_mercury.downsfam.net...
>> erk wrote: >> >> >> Good answer. But I would also like to see the language of the >> > database >> >> and the language of data that is not-persisted be the same; >> > constraints >> >> used by the database and those used by the UI be the same; etc. >> > >> > I agree completely. I think UIs and reports need more than relations; >> > for example, ordering. But I my coding would be drastically shorter and >> > much more expressive if I had relational structures and constraints for >> > my "business logic". And those are useful on all tiers. >> > >> >> What do you mean by this? Do you mean storing biz logic in tables like a >> CASE or RAD tool might do?
>
> Yes. It need not be tables, but some way for the biz logic to be
> available
> to the full range of tiers in an application. --dawn
>
>> -- >> Kenneth Downs >> Use first initial plus last name at last name plus literal "fam.net" to >> email me
and how do you (dawn) do this now?
-- Kenneth Downs Use first initial plus last name at last name plus literal "fam.net" to email meReceived on Wed Oct 27 2004 - 23:26:58 CEST
