Naming convention for dependencies and contingencies?
From: ./Rob & <invalid_at_invalid.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:07:02 -0400
Message-ID: <2aOdnQGpg5PlM-PcRVn-gg_at_speakeasy.net>
Hi Gang,
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:07:02 -0400
Message-ID: <2aOdnQGpg5PlM-PcRVn-gg_at_speakeasy.net>
Hi Gang,
Let's say you have a database that stores entries (example only) for
construction materials.
You have a table with all your materials and any dependencies.
Dependency | Contingency
Are Dependency and Contingency good table names?
It's the best I could think of, but the names just don't seem natural to me.
Plywood | Nails /* Plywood needs Nails to install, but Nails
do not need Plywood */
Roof Shingles | Felt Paper /* To install Shingles you need Felt Paper,
but Felt Paper does not need Shingles */
Felt Paper | Plywood
Felt Paper | Staples
Roof Shingles | Roof Nails
Has anyone used a better naming convention?
Thanks, Received on Tue Oct 26 2004 - 22:07:02 CEST